System Boundaries: A Practical Decision Guide

"How do I define appropriate system boundaries for my study?" is one of the most consequential methodological questions in LCA. Your boundary choices directly affect results, comparability, and conclusions. This guide provides practical frameworks for making these decisions.

Understanding System Boundary Options

The Standard Boundary Types

Visual Representation

CRADLE ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────── GRAVE
   │                                                              │
   ▼                                                              ▼
[Raw Material] → [Manufacturing] → [Distribution] → [Use] → [End-of-Life]
   └──────────────────┬──────────────────┘
                CRADLE-TO-GATE
   └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        CRADLE-TO-GRAVE

FAQ: System Boundary Decisions

"What's the difference between cradle-to-gate, cradle-to-grave, and cradle-to-cradle?"

Cradle-to-gate covers extraction through manufacturing:

• Starts with raw material extraction ("cradle")
• Ends when product leaves the factory ("gate")
• Excludes: transportation to customer, use phase, disposal
• Use when: Selling to other businesses, when downstream is unknown

Cradle-to-grave covers the complete life cycle:

• Starts with raw material extraction
• Ends with final disposal or treatment ("grave")
• Includes: use phase, end-of-life treatment
• Use when: Consumer products, comparative studies, most EPDs

Cradle-to-cradle is both a philosophy and an analytical approach:

• Full life cycle including recycling loops
• Materials return to either biological or technical cycles
• In LCA terms: cradle-to-grave + system expansion for recycling
• Use when: Analyzing circular economy scenarios

"Should I include capital goods/infrastructure in my boundary?"

The short answer: It depends on your study goal and the applicable standard.

What are capital goods? Capital goods are durable assets used in production:

• Manufacturing equipment (machines, production lines)
• Buildings and facilities
• Vehicles and transport infrastructure
• IT equipment

When to include capital goods:

Rule of thumb: Capital goods often contribute <1-5% to most product LCAs. But for:

• Capital-intensive industries (semiconductors, chemicals)
• Long-lived infrastructure (buildings, bridges)
• Equipment with short lifespans or high turnover

...capital goods may be significant.

How to handle capital goods:

1. Include if significant - Screen for materiality
2. Allocate over lifetime - Divide by expected production volume
3. Use proxy data - Many databases include capital goods optionally
4. Document your choice - Be explicit about inclusion/exclusion

"How far upstream should I go in my supply chain?"

The practical answer: As far as data availability and materiality require.

Levels of upstream inclusion:

Database solutions:

Most LCA databases (ecoinvent, GaBi) already trace back to nature. When you select "steel, hot rolled" you automatically get:

• Iron ore mining
• Coking coal production
• Blast furnace operations
• Energy inputs at each stage

The practical challenge: Your specific supply chain.

Foreground vs. Background data:

Your Product
    │
    ├── [FOREGROUND] Your manufacturing process
    │       └── Primary data from your operations
    │
    ├── [FOREGROUND] Tier 1 suppliers
    │       └── Data from direct suppliers (if available)
    │
    └── [BACKGROUND] Everything else
            └── Database proxy data

When to push for supplier-specific data:

1. High-impact materials - If steel is 60% of your impact, get steel supplier data
2. Unusual processes - When your supplier differs significantly from database averages
3. Competitive differentiation - When your supply chain is actually better
4. Regulatory requirements - Some standards mandate supply chain specificity

"How do I handle the use phase?"

Use phase challenges:

The use phase is often the largest contributor to impacts but hardest to model:

• User behavior varies widely
• Product lifespan is uncertain
• Energy sources differ by region
• Maintenance and repair are unpredictable

Approaches by product type:

Standardization approaches:

Many PCRs define standard use scenarios:

• "Average European consumer"
• "2,000 hours of use"
• "50-year building lifespan"
• "10-year vehicle lifespan, 15,000 km/year"

Use standardized scenarios when available for comparability.

"How do I handle end-of-life?"

End-of-life options:

Recycling modeling approaches:

See our Advanced: System Boundary Approaches for detailed coverage of:

• Cut-off approach
• End-of-life (substitution) approach
• Circular Footprint Formula

Common practice:

• EPDs typically use cut-off (recycled input burden-free)
• PEF uses Circular Footprint Formula
• Comparative studies should test both approaches

Setting Boundaries in Practice

Step-by-Step Process

Step 1: Define your goal

• Why are you doing this LCA?
• Who will use the results?
• What decisions will it inform?

Step 2: Check applicable standards

• Is there a PCR? What does it require?
• Are you following ISO, PEF, or sector guidelines?
• What do similar studies include?

Step 3: Map the full life cycle Draw the complete system from raw materials to end-of-life, then decide what to include.

Step 4: Apply cut-off rules Exclude flows that are:

• <1% by mass AND
• <1% by energy AND
• <1% of environmental significance

Step 5: Document everything Include rationale for what's in, what's out, and why.

Common Boundary Mistakes

Mistake 1: Inconsistent boundaries for comparison

• If comparing Product A (cradle-to-grave) with Product B (cradle-to-gate), results are meaningless
• Solution: Use identical boundaries for all alternatives

Mistake 2: Excluding significant impacts

• Excluding use phase for an energy-intensive product
• Solution: Always screen for materiality before excluding

Mistake 3: Double-counting

• Including recycling benefits AND recycled content benefits
• Solution: Use consistent allocation approach throughout

Mistake 4: Ignoring secondary functions

• Your product provides multiple functions but you only count one
• Solution: Consider allocation or system expansion

Boundary Documentation Template

For transparent reporting, document:

SYSTEM BOUNDARY SPECIFICATION

1. Boundary type: [Cradle-to-grave]

2. Life cycle stages included:
   ☑ Raw material extraction
   ☑ Material processing
   ☑ Manufacturing
   ☑ Distribution/transport
   ☑ Use phase
   ☑ End-of-life

3. Exclusions and justification:
   - Capital goods: Excluded (<2% screening estimate)
   - Employee commuting: Excluded (not product-related)
   - R&D: Excluded (negligible per-unit)

4. Geographic boundary: European average

5. Temporal boundary: Current technology (2024)

6. Cut-off criteria: <1% mass/energy/impact combined

Sector-Specific Guidance

Construction Products

• EN 15804 defines modules A1-A5 (product), B1-B7 (use), C1-C4 (end-of-life), D (beyond)
• Minimum: A1-A3 (cradle-to-gate)
• Better: All modules for full comparability

Electronics

• Use phase often dominates (especially displays, servers)
• Include use phase electricity for accurate comparison
• Consider multiple use scenarios (home vs. office)

Packaging

• Often cradle-to-gate (B2B sales)
• If consumer-facing: include end-of-life
• Consider fill rate and transport efficiency

Food Products

• Agricultural phase often dominates
• Include land use change if relevant
• Refrigeration in distribution/retail can be significant

Key Takeaways

1. Boundary choice is goal-dependent—there's no universal "correct" boundary
2. Cradle-to-grave is most comprehensive but cradle-to-gate is common for B2B
3. Capital goods are often excluded but check significance
4. Databases handle upstream supply chain—focus on your foreground data
5. Use consistent boundaries when comparing alternatives
6. Document and justify all boundary decisions

Decision Checklist

Before finalizing your system boundary, confirm:

☐ Goal and scope clearly define the boundary need ☐ Applicable standards/PCRs have been checked ☐ All significant life cycle stages are included ☐ Cut-off criteria are defined and applied consistently ☐ Boundary is identical for all compared alternatives ☐ Capital goods inclusion is justified ☐ End-of-life treatment is defined ☐ Documentation explains all choices

---

Next Steps

With your boundaries defined, the next lesson covers Functional Units & Product Comparison—ensuring fair comparisons when products have different lifespans and functions.