LCA Software Selection Guide: SimaPro vs GaBi vs openLCA
A practical guide to choosing the right LCA software for your needs, with honest comparisons and answers to common questions from the LCA community.
LCA Software Selection Guide
"Which LCA software should I use?" is one of the most common questions in the LCA community. This guide provides practical advice based on real practitioner experiences and helps you make an informed decision.
The Big Three: Quick Comparison
| Aspect | SimaPro | GaBi (Sphera) | openLCA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | $3,000-8,000/year | $5,000-20,000+/year | Free |
| Platform | Windows (cloud available) | Windows | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Learning curve | Moderate | Steep | Moderate |
| Support | Excellent | Excellent | Community + paid |
| Best for | Consultants, academia | Corporations, EPDs | Budget-conscious, researchers |
FAQ: Software Selection
"Which software should I use: SimaPro, GaBi, or openLCA?"
The honest answer: It depends on your situation.
Choose openLCA if:
- You're a student or working with limited budget
- You need Mac or Linux support
- You want to learn LCA fundamentals without financial commitment
- You're comfortable with occasional troubleshooting
- You need Python scripting for automation
Choose SimaPro if:
- You're in consulting and need client recognition
- You want excellent documentation and support
- You need integration with ecoinvent (historically tight integration)
- Budget is available but not unlimited
- You value a large user community for help
Choose GaBi (Sphera) if:
- You work in a large corporation with enterprise needs
- You need industry-specific databases (automotive, electronics, chemicals)
- EPD generation is a core workflow
- You need multi-user collaboration features
- Budget is not a primary constraint
Many practitioners use multiple tools. openLCA for learning and quick checks, SimaPro or GaBi for client-facing work. There's no rule against having more than one tool in your toolkit.
"Why do I get different results in SimaPro vs openLCA?"
This is a common frustration. Results can differ for several reasons:
1. Different database versions
- ecoinvent 3.9.1 in one tool vs 3.8 in another
- Make sure you're using identical database versions
2. Different system models
- ecoinvent has three system models: Cut-off, APOS, and Consequential
- Each gives different results for the same product
3. Different LCIA method versions
- ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 vs v1.03
- CML 2001 vs CML-IA baseline
4. Allocation choices
- Software may have different default allocation methods
- Check your allocation settings explicitly
5. Background process linking
- Automatic linking may choose different background processes
- Transport distances and electricity mixes can vary
Before concluding there's an error, systematically verify: same database version, same system model, same LCIA method version, same allocation approach, and same process linking. Document everything.
How to troubleshoot:
- Export your model from both tools
- Compare the process trees side-by-side
- Check characterization factors for key flows
- Verify that the same unit processes are being used
- Post on ask.openlca.org or the SimaPro forum with specifics
"Is openLCA a viable free alternative for professional work?"
Yes, but with caveats.
openLCA strengths:
- Full LCA functionality (product systems, LCIA, Monte Carlo)
- Supports all major databases (ecoinvent, GaBi, USLCI)
- Active development and community
- Python/SQL scripting for advanced users
- Published papers and professional reports use it regularly
openLCA challenges:
- Less polished user interface than commercial tools
- Documentation can be patchy for advanced features
- No official phone support (community forums + paid support options)
- Some clients may question non-commercial software
- Occasional bugs in new releases (let versions mature)
Professional use recommendations:
- Use stable releases, not beta versions
- Budget time for learning curve
- Join ask.openlca.org for community support
- Consider paid support from GreenDelta if needed
- Document your methods thoroughly for client confidence
Many consultancies, universities, and even large companies use openLCA professionally. The software itself is capable—the question is whether you have the support structure you need.
Beyond the Big Three
One Click LCA
Best for: Construction and building sector
- Cloud-based, very user-friendly
- Built-in EPD generation
- Strong BIM integration
- Limited to construction scope
Brightway
Best for: Researchers and developers
- Python-based framework
- Maximum flexibility and automation
- Requires programming skills
- Used for cutting-edge LCA research
Activity Browser
Best for: Brightway users wanting a GUI
- Built on Brightway
- Point-and-click interface
- Best of both worlds for Python-capable users
Umberto
Best for: Material flow analysis
- Visual flow modeling
- Manufacturing focus
- Strong on process optimization
Ecochain
Best for: Rapid product footprinting
- Cloud-based
- Quick assessments
- Good API for integration
Decision Framework
Use this flowchart to guide your choice:
Step 1: What's your budget?
- Zero → openLCA or Brightway
- Some → SimaPro or One Click LCA
- Enterprise → GaBi/Sphera
Step 2: What's your sector?
- Construction → Consider One Click LCA
- Automotive/Electronics → GaBi has strong databases
- Academic research → Brightway or openLCA
- General consulting → SimaPro or openLCA
Step 3: What's your technical comfort?
- Prefer polished UX → SimaPro or One Click LCA
- Comfortable troubleshooting → openLCA
- Want to code → Brightway
Step 4: What do clients/stakeholders expect?
- Name recognition matters → SimaPro or GaBi
- Budget-conscious clients → openLCA is fine
- Internal use only → Any capable tool works
Practical Tips
Starting Out
- Start with openLCA to learn fundamentals without financial pressure
- Use free databases (USLCI) before investing in ecoinvent
- Complete tutorials before starting real projects
- Join communities early—you'll need help
Transitioning Between Tools
Most LCA software can:
- Import/export EcoSpold and ILCD formats
- Share database files
- Transfer models (with some adjustment)
Your skills transfer more than your files—understanding LCA methodology matters more than mastering one software's interface.
Handling Client Preferences
If a client requires specific software:
- Many consultants maintain multiple licenses
- Sub-contracting for specific tools is common
- Cloud/educational licenses reduce multi-tool costs
Software Won't Fix Methodology
No software will compensate for poor methodology. Before worrying about which tool to use, ensure you understand:
- How to define appropriate functional units
- When and how to apply allocation
- How to interpret uncertainty
- What your system boundaries should include
The tool is just a calculator. You provide the thinking.
Key Takeaways
- openLCA is viable for professional work if you can handle the learning curve
- SimaPro leads in consultant recognition and support
- GaBi/Sphera excels for enterprise and industry-specific needs
- Results differ between tools due to databases, methods, and settings—not fundamental flaws
- Start free, upgrade when needed—you can always switch tools later
- Community matters—choose software with active support forums
Resources for Each Platform
openLCA:
- ask.openlca.org - Community Q&A
- openLCA.org - Downloads and documentation
- openLCA YouTube - Video tutorials
SimaPro:
- SimaPro Help Center
- PRé Sustainability Blog
- SimaPro User Conference (annual)
GaBi/Sphera:
- Sphera Support
- GaBi Academy training programs
- Industry-specific webinars
Next Steps
Ready to dive deeper? The next lesson covers Database Access & Licensing—understanding how to get the data you need for your LCA work.